Many in The Netherlands, the USA and other Western societies have embraced Somali Islam critic Hirsi Ayaan Ali. This is because of her courageous stand against Islam and the danger that Muslim colonies on Western soil pose to Western host societies.
I have pointed out that she is both an enemy of Islam AND to the traditional societal underpinnings of the West such as its spirituality and core populations.
She has supported action against SGP, a Dutch Christian party which discriminates against women (they are not electable and not supposed to vote). And she thinks Flemish anti-immigration party Vlaams Belang should be banned, due to its hostility against the immigrant invasion of Flanders (Dutch-speaking Belgium).
She has done it again (HT, Laurence Auster): in an interview with London-based Metro she equates Catholic Christianity with Islam, Communism and Nazism: "Do you see any positive sides to Islam?That’s like asking if I see positive sides to Nazism, Communism, Catholicism. Of course Islam preaches generosity and kindness and taking care of the poor and elderly and so on – but these values aren’t limited to Islam. If you weigh what is provided in terms of kindness and humanity against the evil that can come from a society built on radical Islam, you will see that liberals must stand up to this like they’ve stood up to other ideologies."
The real reason why Westerners embrace an immigrant like Ayaan critizising Islam, is that Westerners are lacking in balls. They fear Islam, but they fear being ostracised by the PC community for critizising their Holy Cow: the non-Western immigrant. So they run after any immigrant who will do the dirty jobs they themself do not want to do: taking on the PC-monolith.
Westerners better get their spine back and defend their rights from encroachment by the State and the colonies of immigrants. Or they will end up with no rights and no future.
No comments:
Post a Comment